Em Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:49:30PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:13:44 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The WARN_ON is just to be paranoid for a while, I should have done
> > that a loooong time ago :-\
>
> I appreciate the intentions here but the resulting code is
> really a mess. We have this thing now in in.h called
> "inet_something()" that tests TCP state, and then we have
> something similar for ipv6 in addrconf.c :-)
>
> Let's do one thing at a time. First, fix the original bug
> in tcp_ipv4.c by just putting your inet_rcv_saddr() shorthand
> right there in tcp_ipv4.c and name it tcp4_rcv_saddr() or
> something like that.
>
> Then we can move onto the rest of the changes and try to find
> a common place for the helper routines.
>
> See what happens when you try to do too many things at one
> time :-)
:) Here is the first part:
===== net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c 1.69 vs edited =====
--- 1.69/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c Wed Oct 8 12:27:40 2003
+++ edited/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c Wed Oct 15 09:26:29 2003
@@ -178,9 +178,15 @@
tcp_sk(sk)->bind_hash = tb;
}
+static inline const u32 tcp_v4_rcv_saddr(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return likely(sk->sk_state != TCP_TIME_WAIT) ?
+ inet_sk(sk)->rcv_saddr : tcptw_sk(sk)->tw_rcv_saddr;
+}
+
static inline int tcp_bind_conflict(struct sock *sk, struct tcp_bind_bucket
*tb)
{
- struct inet_opt *inet = inet_sk(sk);
+ const u32 sk_rcv_saddr = tcp_v4_rcv_saddr(sk);
struct sock *sk2;
struct hlist_node *node;
int reuse = sk->sk_reuse;
@@ -193,9 +199,9 @@
sk->sk_bound_dev_if == sk2->sk_bound_dev_if)) {
if (!reuse || !sk2->sk_reuse ||
sk2->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
- struct inet_opt *inet2 = inet_sk(sk2);
- if (!inet2->rcv_saddr || !inet->rcv_saddr ||
- inet2->rcv_saddr == inet->rcv_saddr)
+ const u32 sk2_rcv_saddr = tcp_v4_rcv_saddr(sk2);
+ if (!sk2_rcv_saddr || !sk_rcv_saddr ||
+ sk2_rcv_saddr == sk_rcv_saddr)
break;
}
}
|