| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.4/2.6 PATCHES] Change some ip_fragment checks to help IPVS |
| From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:55:43 +0300 (EEST) |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200310141203.QAA23474@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello,
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Yes. The test was to eliminate the pathological cases, but the test
> is really valid only when skb is generated by ip_append_*. If skb as whole
> is now owned, it is also perfect case.
One related question: is ip_fragment() backport from 2.6
to 2.4 planned? Because so many NF hooks were changed to avoid
linearization but ip_fragment is still outdated and the forced
reassembly after ip_defrag is not always a good thing.
> Alexey
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] (07/12) Probe2 -- 3c505, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.4/2.6 PATCHES] Change some ip_fragment checks to help IPVS, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.4/2.6 PATCHES] Change some ip_fragment checks to help IPVS, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [2.4/2.6 PATCHES] Change some ip_fragment checks to help IPVS, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |