| To: | Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) |
| From: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:24:33 -0700 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031011194008.GA2395@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | OSDL |
| References: | <20031010141646.779f10bb.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> <20031011120852.13fa8ec4.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031011194008.GA2395@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: | On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:08:52PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: | > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:16:46 -0700 | > "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> wrote: | > | > > http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/atmprocfs_260t7.patch | > | > How can this be needed? When procfs is disabled then | > remove_proc_entry() is defined as "do { } while (0)", ie. a nop. | | Due to this - the real offender: | | from: net/atm/clip.c: | #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS | #include <linux/proc_fs.h> | #include <linux/seq_file.h> | #endif ugh, thanks. -- ~Randy |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFT] Re: Fw: Nasty Oops in 2.6.0-test6 bind/SO_REUSEADDR, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Handle shared SKBs in VLAN receive code, Tommy Christensen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), Randy.Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |