| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) |
| From: | Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200 |
| Cc: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031011120852.13fa8ec4.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20031010141646.779f10bb.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> <20031011120852.13fa8ec4.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:08:52PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:16:46 -0700 > "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/atmprocfs_260t7.patch > > How can this be needed? When procfs is disabled then > remove_proc_entry() is defined as "do { } while (0)", ie. a nop. Due to this - the real offender: from: net/atm/clip.c: #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS #include <linux/proc_fs.h> #include <linux/seq_file.h> #endif Sam |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux 2.4.23-pre7 (irda compile fixes), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |