Re: [PATCH] hostess -- return value check for register

netdev

Re: [PATCH] hostess -- return value check for register_netdev

To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] hostess -- return value check for register_netdev
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:12:34 -0700
Cc:	jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20031010103225.2177d385.shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
References:	<20031009112714.18742308.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20031010000158.2dc9ce78.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031010103225.2177d385.shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:32:25 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Another driver that checks for register_netdev returing -1 when
> it can return -EIO or -EEXIST.

Applied, thanks Stephen.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] cosa -- incorrect comparison for register_netdev, Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] cosa -- incorrect comparison for register_netdev, David S. Miller [PATCH] synclink -- incorrect check of register_netdev return val., Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] synclink -- incorrect check of register_netdev return val., David S. Miller [PATCH] hostess -- return value check for register_netdev, Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] hostess -- return value check for register_netdev, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] synclink -- incorrect check of register_netdev return val., David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] hostess -- return value check for register_netdev, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] tun driver use private linked list., Max Krasnyansky
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]