| To: | Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] (resend) fix sock_raw behaviour |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Oct 2003 23:53:38 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-hams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031008235150.A207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20031008235150.A207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:51:50 +0200 Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is a resend of a patch from some weeks ago that doesn't appear to have > made it in yet... It doesn't apply, that's why. You patch ax25.h twice the same exact way which causes the patch to not apply. While we're talking about this, who is going to maintain AX25 in 2.6.x? I don't want to be taking bug fixes and other changes to AX25 from random people, I'd like to have a single contact that will review the AX25 patches from other people and then forward them off to me. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFT] Re: Fw: Nasty Oops in 2.6.0-test6 bind/SO_REUSEADDR, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] memory leak in irda/sa1100_ir.c, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] (resend) fix sock_raw behaviour, Jeroen Vreeken |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] (resend) fix sock_raw behaviour, Jeroen Vreeken |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |