| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:33:06 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, modica@xxxxxxx, johnip@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, jes@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031008132402.64984528.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3F844578.40306@xxxxxxx> <20031008101046.376abc3b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3F8455BE.8080300@xxxxxxx> <20031008183742.GA24822@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031008122223.1ba5ac79.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031008202248.GA15611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031008132402.64984528.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > The suballocation would need to be per CPU to be SMP efficient I guess, > > which would complicate it. > > Andi, stop right there, we're talking about mitigating the horrible > performance some $6.00 USD Taiwaneese network cards get on expensive > ia64 systems. How much effort do you think we should drain into > optimizing this? :-) Well, this thread was about the tigon3 and I don't see that as an el cheapo card. If SGI uses it on the Altix I guess they want it to perform well with many CPUs. Anyways, it was just a brain dump regarding your idea. I personally think it's better to just use slab to implement it, allocating pages doesn't seem to have any advantages to me. -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Fw: Nasty Oops in 2.6.0-test6 bind/SO_REUSEADDR, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |