| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:24:02 -0700 |
| Cc: | ak@xxxxxxx, modica@xxxxxxx, johnip@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, jes@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031008202248.GA15611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3F844578.40306@xxxxxxx> <20031008101046.376abc3b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3F8455BE.8080300@xxxxxxx> <20031008183742.GA24822@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031008122223.1ba5ac79.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031008202248.GA15611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:22:48 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > It's not that it's a new problem - we had this since the Alpha port > and it hasn't gotten more urgent suddenly. Frankly, I just want to shut all the ia64 users up because they keep barking due to the kernel unaligned trap message that port spits out. > Hmm - you mean it allocates a full page and does suballocation by itself? We could write some helper routines. > The suballocation would need to be per CPU to be SMP efficient I guess, > which would complicate it. Andi, stop right there, we're talking about mitigating the horrible performance some $6.00 USD Taiwaneese network cards get on expensive ia64 systems. How much effort do you think we should drain into optimizing this? :-) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |