[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:24:02 -0700
Cc: ak@xxxxxxx, modica@xxxxxxx, johnip@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, jes@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031008202248.GA15611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3F844578.40306@xxxxxxx> <20031008101046.376abc3b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3F8455BE.8080300@xxxxxxx> <20031008183742.GA24822@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031008122223.1ba5ac79.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031008202248.GA15611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:22:48 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> It's not that it's a new problem - we had this since the Alpha port
> and it hasn't gotten more urgent suddenly.

Frankly, I just want to shut all the ia64 users up because they keep
barking due to the kernel unaligned trap message that port spits out.

> Hmm - you mean it allocates a full page and does suballocation by itself?

We could write some helper routines.

> The suballocation would need to be per CPU to be SMP efficient I guess,
> which would complicate it.

Andi, stop right there, we're talking about mitigating the horrible
performance some $6.00 USD Taiwaneese network cards get on expensive
ia64 systems.  How much effort do you think we should drain into
optimizing this? :-)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>