netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Bridge] RE: [VLAN] Re: [PATCH/RFC] Let {ip, arp}tables "see" bridge

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Tommy Christensen <tommy.christensen@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] RE: [VLAN] Re: [PATCH/RFC] Let {ip, arp}tables "see" bridged VLAN tagged{I,AR}P packets
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:58:59 -0700
Cc: Christian.Darnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vlan@xxxxxxxxxxx, bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1065600565.2572.209.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5B537508CDBED3118403009027745A210B8C1499@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1065600565.2572.209.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On 08 Oct 2003 10:09:25 +0200
Tommy Christensen <tommy.christensen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is because the VLAN code is mangling shared data.
> You need to do something like this:

This fix is definitely needed and correct, patch applied
thanks.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [2.6 PATCH] ipvs - avoid returning NF_DROP from the packet schedulers, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  RE: [Bridge] RE: [VLAN] Re: [PATCH/RFC] Let {ip, arp}tables "see" bridged VLAN tagged{I,AR}P packets, Christian Darnell
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Bridge] RE: [VLAN] Re: [PATCH/RFC] Let {ip, arp}tables "see" bridged VLAN tagged{I,AR}P packets, Tommy Christensen
Next by Thread:  [PATCH] Mark non 64bit clean network drivers, Andi Kleen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]