netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: comment on [NET]: Delete support for old-style protocols, no longer

To: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: comment on [NET]: Delete support for old-style protocols, no longer necessary.
From: Dan Kegel <dank@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:22:34 -0700
Cc: David S Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1065569620.2340.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1065551829.2340.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031007115244.14a887ed.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1065569620.2340.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
Joe Perches wrote:
-       void                    *af_packet_priv;
+       struct sock             *sk;    /* appropriate comment: socket copy? */

AF_PACKET is the only user of this private field, and
I want people to be aware of this and not try to use it
for other stuff.

Nobody else can use it for something different, the code
in net/core/dev.c does specific things when it's non-NULL
knowing that this non-NULL value means that it's an
AF_PACKET packet_type being passed to it.

So we won't make your suggested change.

Even so, why not call it a struct sock*?
It is after all and is used as one.

To discourage other modules from using it, and to keep
programmers who aren't working on AF_PACKET from thinking about it.
It's SOP to use opaque cookies when you want to make data private.
- Dan

--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>