| To: | Kevin Dwyer <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Strange UDP binding behavior (SO_BINDTODEVICE) |
| From: | Casey Carter <Casey@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:49:36 -0500 |
| Cc: | Casey Carter <ccarter@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031007170823.41ef2ff9.kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20031005130154.5bd9d182.kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3F81F1CD.8050803@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031006210600.37da62c9.kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3F83276D.3070700@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20031007170823.41ef2ff9.kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030903 Thunderbird/0.2 |
Kevin Dwyer wrote: There is actually a similar ranking algorithm in 2.4, with a similar fix. I'll work up a patch and resubmit to netdev in hopes that one of the gurus will pick it up.On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 15:51:57 -0500 Casey Carter <ccarter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:IMHO, the delivery should weigh sk_bound_dev_if much more strongly (7 instead of 2), so that if-bound sockets are always favored over non-if-bound. I would be happy to submit the (trivial) patch to do so if the networking gurus agree?Any possibility of getting this behavior into 2.4 as well? Albeit, without the scoring since that's obviously a new concept introduced by 2.6. (Which I prefer; well done.) I confess that I don't know who to talk to about such a change. -- Casey Carter Casey@xxxxxxxxxx ccarter@xxxxxxxxxxx AIM: cartec69 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Strange UDP binding behavior (SO_BINDTODEVICE), Kevin Dwyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Fix 64bit bugs in dscc4.c, Francois Romieu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Strange UDP binding behavior (SO_BINDTODEVICE), Kevin Dwyer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-announce] [PATCH SET][bonding] cleanup, Willy TARREAU |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |