netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:35:18 +0900 (JST)
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031007041246.13aa0391.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20031007034051.3fcb3218.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200310071116.PAA30760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031007041246.13aa0391.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20031007041246.13aa0391.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 7 Oct 2003 
04:12:46 -0700), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:16:20 +0400 (MSD)
> kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > Actually, this does not depend on our implementation. If people implement
> > a MIB, required precision of these times is prescribed in the rfc.
> > And this is definitely not jiffies.
> 
> Right, Shirley what is it?

The type is TimeTicks (RFC2578) via TimeStamp (RFC2579).
Thus, uint32_t counter in 1/100 sec. unit.

--yoshfuji

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>