[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm

To: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 06:58:24 -0700
Cc: chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031003022615.GA42593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200310011134.h91BYPkT003172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031001054226.126cea7b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031003022615.GA42593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:26:15 -0700
Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> My personal recommendations:
>   * There should be a per-atm-device semaphore held across calls into the
>     driver's ->open, ->close, ->change_qos and maybe a couple other things
>     to serialize those operations (for the sake of keeping the drivers
>     sane - there's no reason there should be multiple operations pending)

Ok, but what Chas is trying to do is move the ATM device stuff over
to a model that makes use of the existing network device infrastructure
for solving these kinds of problems.

Part of that is using the rtnl semaphore etc.

I would rather Chas use the rtnl semaphore for synchronization
than to ultra-optimize this code by using the rwlock as I had suggested
to him.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>