| To: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: [BUG/PATCH] CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL and SMP |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:47:40 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, dfages@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <16252.17618.866515.952549@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030929123734.5bd97a47.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <16248.41796.797321.700866@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3F78A691.1040406@xxxxxxxxx> <16252.17618.866515.952549@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 |
Robert Olsson wrote: Jeff Garzik writes:> > If someone had a NAPI patch for tulip, we could remove HW_FLOWCONTROL > option altogether :)Hello! Here is something for 2.6.0-test6: * ifdef's to keep current non-NAPI tulip intact * Port based on Alexey's orig NAPI tulip design (Only RX handled by dev->poll) * tulip HW_FLOW removed * NAPI and HW-mitigation options in Kconfig Looks great to me. I'll give it some testing here, and 99% likely will apply it. Andrew, would you be willing to merge this into -mm for some simultaneous netwide testing? FWIW, I seem to recall that the older NAPI patch you sent didn't apply for some reason. But forget about that, this one looks good.
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm, Mitchell Blank Jr |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] skbuff more likely/unlikely, Mitchell Blank Jr |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw: [BUG/PATCH] CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL and SMP, Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: [BUG/PATCH] CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL and SMP, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |