[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [bonding] compatibilty issues

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [bonding] compatibilty issues
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:54:25 -0700
Cc: chad@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3F78C262.30109@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030929232534.GB93323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3F78C262.30109@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:38:10 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Well, if that's David's sentiment, then I respectfully disagree with that.

I really really really did intend to move these deprecated as fast as
possible.  This is because these bonding ioctls use SIOCDEVPRIVATE

I don't think it's much of a burdon to remove their existence from
the 2.6.x copy of the driver, and I really wish you guys would do
this because then people would fix their tools.

You can very simply compile a copy of the tool that works with the
non-SIOCDEVPRIVATE ioctls we added to the bonding driver a LONG time
ago and it'll work with 2.4.x as well.  It doesn't break because
you made it work with the non-ambiguous ioctl values.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>