| To: | Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6 |
| From: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:29:19 +0300 (EEST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <lksctp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030928225941.GW15338@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote: > It seems modular IPv6 doesn't work 100% reliable, e.g. after looking at > the code it doesn't seem to be a good idea to compile a kernel without > IPv6 support and later build and install IPv6 modules. Is there a great > need for modular IPv6 or is the patch below to disallow modular IPv6 OK? IPv6 modularity is critical for all the Linux distributions who wish to give the users the possibility to turn on IPv6 if they wish, but turning it on by default for everybody is not realistic. IMHO, making it non-modular is *NOT* an option. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATRCH] janitor: hermes: delete verify_area call, David Gibson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, David Woodhouse |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Olivier Galibert |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] Memory Barriers on cosa wan driver, Felipe W Damasio |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |