Re: [PATCH] (0/7) device_probe enhancement

netdev

Re: [PATCH] (0/7) device_probe enhancement

To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] (0/7) device_probe enhancement
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:39:10 -0700
Cc:	jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030923144721.6001c598.shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
References:	<20030923144721.6001c598.shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:47:21 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This comes from Al Viro's net device patchset and is updated for
> 2.6.0-test5 latest.  It adds a second probe list for network devices
> that are compiled into the kernel, but allocate their own network
> device rather than being handed a device.  It is part of the
> incremental changes to have all network devices using dynamic
> allocation.

This all looks fine to me.  Jeff, what do you think?  Are you gonna
merge it if it's ok to you?

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] (0/7) device_probe enhancement, Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] (0/7) device_probe enhancement, David S. Miller <= Re: [PATCH] (0/7) device_probe enhancement, Jeff Garzik Re: [PATCH] (0/7) device_probe enhancement, Jeff Garzik [PATCH] (1/7) de620 -- dynamic allocation (resend), Stephen Hemminger

Previous by Date:	PROBLEM: oops in 2.4.23pre1, Promise-ide, samba, Sebastian Piecha
Next by Date:	assertion failure at net/sched/sch_generic.c(530), David Brownell
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] (0/7) device_probe enhancement, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] (0/7) device_probe enhancement, Jeff Garzik
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]