Re: [PATCH] (3/3) rtnetlink -- ASSERT_RTNL and BUG

netdev

Re: [PATCH] (3/3) rtnetlink -- ASSERT_RTNL and BUG_TRAP

To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] (3/3) rtnetlink -- ASSERT_RTNL and BUG_TRAP
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2003 04:02:43 -0700
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030922163946.5854bb8e.shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
References:	<20030922163946.5854bb8e.shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:39:46 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Change ASSERT_RTNL and BUG_TRAP
>       - unlikely to occur
>       - tag message as error
>       - dump_stack in ASSERT_RTNL to aide finding code path
>       - make all format's which a smart compiler can optimize

Looks good to me, applied thanks.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] (3/3) rtnetlink -- ASSERT_RTNL and BUG_TRAP, Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] (3/3) rtnetlink -- ASSERT_RTNL and BUG_TRAP, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] 2/3 rtnetlink -- RTA_PUT unlikely., David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), chas williams
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] (3/3) rtnetlink -- ASSERT_RTNL and BUG_TRAP, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] 1/3 rtnetlink -- rtattr_strcmp const args., Stephen Hemminger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]