| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | patricia tries vs. hash for routing? |
| From: | Kristen Carlson <kristenc@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:29:10 -0700 |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hi, I'm wondering if somebody has already written a patch that replaces the current routing algorithm (hash) with one that is based on a trie based algorithm? I'm also wondering if anybody has done any performance comparisons with very large route tables to see which one scales better? thanks, Kristen -- WWXD (What Would Xena Do?) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] more const in skbuff, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] [WAN] use module_exit in sdladrv, Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] more const in skbuff, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patricia tries vs. hash for routing?, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |