Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup

netdev

Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup

To:	Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:41:19 -0700
Cc:	romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030916031355.GC7982@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20030913055033.GB94744@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030913093559.A23840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030913080252.GE94744@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030913110353.B23840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030913201559.GI94744@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030914125549.A7790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030914112628.GD42531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030915155652.3e5e89a0.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030916031355.GC7982@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:13:55 -0700
Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> How about something like the following.  It expands the comment but turns
> that bit of code into an inline function so we onlt have to explain it
> once.

Looks good, applied.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, Mitchell Blank Jr Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, Francois Romieu Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, Mitchell Blank Jr Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, Francois Romieu Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, Mitchell Blank Jr Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, Francois Romieu Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, Mitchell Blank Jr Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, Mitchell Blank Jr Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [netfilter-core] Re: skb linearization, Rusty Russell
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] deprecate dev_get, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, Mitchell Blank Jr
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] NET: use proc_net_fops_create() for /proc/net/wireless, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]