| To: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:54:15 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030915155225.3cf90d79.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030915155225.3cf90d79.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:52:25 -0700 "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think that we need to ask the netdev people about this... If the current generation of the bonding userland tools have stopped using these older ioctl values, yes we should kill them from the entire kernel tree. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [IPV4] convert proc/net/pnp to seq_file., David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] tiny af_packet.c cleanup, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5, Randy.Dunlap |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5, Jay Vosburgh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |