| To: | Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH/RFC] disallow vlan devices on top of a logical bridge device |
| From: | Krzysztof Halasa <khc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 02 Sep 2003 20:24:35 +0200 |
| Cc: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200309021932.37224.bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200308301504.03241.bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030830203043.0eb1a660.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030902082807.0e18fe76.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <200309021932.37224.bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > OK. But isn't br0.15 supposed to work like this: all vlan tagged traffic > with > tag different from 15 is discarded, all non-tagged traffic is given to br0. Actually I think non-VLAN15 traffic shouldn't make it to br0.15 in the first place, the same with physical ethernet and anything like that. > The vlan code only sees tagged packets if the > packets are destined for the bridge box itself, so bridged traffic is > unaffected. Sure. Do you mean packets received from ethernet interface (br0 port)? They go to br0, of course. I don't see anything special here. I understand you don't need VLAN support for trunk bridging. You need it for locally accessing VLANs (trunk members) only. -- Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] ethertap update, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ethertap update, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH/RFC] disallow vlan devices on top of a logical bridge device, Bart De Schuymer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH/RFC] disallow vlan devices on top of a logical bridge device, Bart De Schuymer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |