netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] small skbuff.[ch] tweaks

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] small skbuff.[ch] tweaks
From: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 02:10:59 -0700
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030902105833.04778449.ak@xxxxxxx>
References: <20030902081625.GA52298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030902105833.04778449.ak@xxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Both unlikely(!ptr) and likely(ptr) are not needed because gcc assumes this
> by default

Is there any disadvantage to stating it explicitly?

-Mitch

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>