netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH][ATM] a few patches from John Levon

To: chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] a few patches from John Levon
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:59:07 -0700
Cc: chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200309041917.h84JHrSa020864@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
References: <200309041917.h84JHrSa020864@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 15:17:55 -0400
chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> # The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
> # --------------------------------------------
> # 03/09/04    chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx     1.1422
> # [ATM]: fix atm_dev module refcount bug (from levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> # --------------------------------------------
> #
 ...
> # The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
> # --------------------------------------------
> # 03/09/04    chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx     1.1422
> # [ATM]: fix atm_dev module refcount bug (from levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> # --------------------------------------------
> #

You're sending double patches again Chas.

This would all actually be easier if you sent each ATM patch in
a seperate email.  When you send them all in one group it's harder
to seperate out each one for discussion or comments.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>