| To: | chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: forcing bottom half to a specific processor on numa |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:44:21 -0700 |
| Cc: | chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200308291549.h7TFngl5014364@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200308291549.h7TFngl5014364@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:49:43 -0400 chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > is there a reason i shouldnt do this? is there a better way? Just bind the interrupts of your card to a processor local to the numa node in question using the IRQ affinity stuff. Then all softints you schedule will run on that processor too, when you schedule a softint or a tasklet it runs on the cpu where you perform that schedule. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Linux-ATM-General] Neighbor Table Overflow? (fwd), John Fraizer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH/RFC] disallow vlan devices on top of a logical bridge device, Bart De Schuymer |
| Previous by Thread: | forcing bottom half to a specific processor on numa, chas williams |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] (2/3) llc - need to set owner on created sockets., Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |