| To: | "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "James Morris" <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file |
| From: | "Hen, Shmulik" <shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:43:24 +0300 |
| Cc: | <bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcNrL7+Qq6ZJTHQkRxGIJFUoe9lQxgACMhig |
| Thread-topic: | [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemminger@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:45 PM > To: James Morris > Cc: Hen, Shmulik; Chad Tindel; Jay Vosburgh; David S. Miller; > Jeff Garzik; bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface > to seq_file > > Using a pointer with seq_file was really easy. [snip] > seq->private = PDE(inode)->data; Yes, but PDE(inode) does not exist in 2.4 yet, and we wanted to achieve compatibility between bonding in 2.6 and 2.4 first so we may then update 2.6 bonding which is too far behind what's in 2.4 bonding. Once this is done it will be possible to develop on 2.6, and back port into 2.4 from time to time. Shmulik. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |