netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: socket(7) error?

To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: socket(7) error?
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:42:44 +0200
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030821031938.GA19630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030821031938.GA19630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:19:38AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> Hi.  There's a bug report from Martin Pool against manpages-dev suggesting
> the following paragraph from socket(7) is incorrect:
> 
>        SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO
>               Specify  the  sending  or  receiving timeouts until reporting an
>               error.  They are fixed to a protocol specific setting  in  Linux
>               and  cannot  be read or written. Their functionality can be emu-
>               lated using alarm(2) or setitimer(2).
> 
> He says:
> 
>    In fact, these options do seem to be at least partially implemented
>    in Linux 2.4.20.  You can at least set and retrieve a value against
>    a socket, and it does seem to affect the (complex) network scheduling
>    code.

It was correct when the manpage was written, but wasn't updated
later when option was implemented.

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>