| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] (0/9) free_netdev -- delay freeing of net_device structure till after last use |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:24:32 -0700 |
| Cc: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, mochel@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3F42877B.9040407@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030819121800.009db89b.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20030819124818.476dc36d.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3F42877B.9040407@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:24:27 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Also, my tendency is to apply patches 1-8, and not apply patch 9 just > yet. Even though patch 9 is a fix, those specific areas of code, I'm > betting, will change when those drivers are fixed WRT full dynamic > allocation and refcounting. > > Comments? I disagree about patch 9. These drivers already dynamically allocate their netdev structs, so they do not require any more fixing. I just double checked each driver changes in patch 9 and to me this is undoubtedly the case. These are just pure bug fixes. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] (0/9) free_netdev -- delay freeing of net_device structure till after last use, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Harley Stenzel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] (0/9) free_netdev -- delay freeing of net_device structure till after last use, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] (0/9) free_netdev -- delay freeing of net_device structure till after last use, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |