netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices

from [Bas Bloemsaat] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Alan Cox" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices
From: "Bas Bloemsaat" <bloemsaa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:19:44 +0200
Cc: <skraw@xxxxxxxxxx>, <willy@xxxxxxxxx>, <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <carlosev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <davidsen@xxxxxxx>, <marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <layes@xxxxxxxxx>, <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <353568DCBAE06148B70767C1B1A93E625EAB58@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><20030819145403.GA3407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><20030819170751.2b92ba2e.skraw@xxxxxxxxxx><20030819085717.56046afd.davem@xxxxxxxxxx><20030819185219.116fd259.skraw@xxxxxxxxxx><1061319864.30565.52.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030819120131.1999b1ec.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> Indeed, would people stop quoting from RFC 985 and
> RFC 826.

RFC 826 is referenced from 1009 as describing ARP. So in effect it does
define a standard.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Discussion fucking closed WAS(Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, jamal
Next by Date:  Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, David S. Miller
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]