| To: | Willy Tarreau <willy@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:28:33 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030818142847.GA19910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200308171759540391.00AA8CAB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1061137577.21885.50.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200308171827130739.00C3905F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1061141045.21885.74.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030817224849.GB734@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030817223118.3cbc497c.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030818133957.3d3d51d2.skraw@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030818044419.0bc24d14.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030818125158.GA18699@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030818055329.44db9262.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030818142847.GA19910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:28:47 +0200 Willy Tarreau <willy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Now if you think that the behaviour I'm proposing is broken, please explain me > why. If the user overrides the source address (which is the case I believe you're talking about, there are so many cases it's hard for me to keep track) then HE KNOWS WHAT HE IS DOING even if using that source address to talk to a particular remote address makes no sense. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Willy Tarreau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: double-check me?, Jason Lunz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Willy Tarreau |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Bas Bloemsaat |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |