| To: | "David S . Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Convert ax25 to seq_file |
| From: | Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:34:46 +0200 |
| Cc: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, linux-hams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030813031159.6c6c9629.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; from davem@xxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:11:59 +0200 |
| References: | <20030812194653.A28977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812135655.7334887b.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20030812230951.E28977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812153901.6e700dcb.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20030813010301.K28977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812172151.7de0c950.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20030813031159.6c6c9629.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 2003.08.13 12:11:59 +0200 David S. Miller wrote: > I have a bazillion different ax.25 patches in my inbox now, > some should be applied and others not, and this is hard to > determine with all the activity. > > Can someone send me a coherent set of patches to apply once > all the issues have been worked out? This is my last patch (rxq4) plus Stephen's last three (dev locking, setsockopt, seq_file) Jeroen p.s. Which protocol is a good example of non-linear skb usage? Most still seem to use skb_linearize() and the skb documentation is somewhat outdated.
|
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] (2/2) Convert yam driver to seq_file, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework, Ralph Doncaster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Convert ax25 to seq_file, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Convert ax25 to seq_file, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |