[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Convert ax25 to seq_file

To: Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert ax25 to seq_file
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:42:52 -0700
Cc: shemminger@xxxxxxxx, linux-hams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030813173446.A2604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030812194653.A28977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812135655.7334887b.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20030812230951.E28977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812153901.6e700dcb.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20030813010301.K28977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812172151.7de0c950.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20030813031159.6c6c9629.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030813173446.A2604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:34:46 +0200
Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is my last patch (rxq4) plus Stephen's last three (dev locking,
> setsockopt, seq_file)

Please don't combine the patches, I want the each individual
patch with the author and his comments for that change.

If you combine all the work, this information gets lost.

Also, please use something more intelligent to generate these
diffs, so that I don't have to sift through all of the lines
like "Only in ...".


> p.s. Which protocol is a good example of non-linear skb usage? Most still
> seem to use skb_linearize() and the skb documentation is somewhat outdated.

What are you talking about?  There are only a handful of skb_linearize()
users in the current 2.6.x sources, and those will be eradicated

IPV4 is probably the best example.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>