| To: | shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 12 Aug 2003 10:29:14 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, laurent.deniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200308121703.15567.shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <E791C176A6139242A988ABA8B3D9B38A0251E69F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200308121703.15567.shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 10:03, Shmulik Hen wrote: > > What scope are we talking about here ? > 2.4 ? 2.6 ? 2.7 ? other ? > Our current aim is 2.4 and 2.6. > You should start thinking 2.7. > Taking into account the two statements I made above: > Do you think that what we're doing right now might interfere with what > Jamal is suggesting ? > Wouldn't it be possible to do things the old way first and than > convert everything to the new way ? > Shouldn't all this be a part of a totally new project like "bonding2" yes, this would be next gen - 2.7 or above target. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, Laurent DENIEL |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, Laurent DENIEL |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, Shmulik Hen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |