Re: Problem with __check_and

netdev

Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey

To:	SZALAY Attila <sasa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:03:40 -0700
Cc:	yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sasa@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030812140516.GA27237@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20030812132050.GA27178@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812.225527.35784879.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812140516.GA27237@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:05:16 +0200
SZALAY Attila <sasa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The patch in vanilla kernel:

As I said in another email, your patch is unnecessary and
the bug has been fixed in current kernels already.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Problem with __check_and_rekey, SZALAY Attila Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey, David S. Miller Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey, SZALAY Attila Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Next by Date:	Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey, SZALAY Attila
Next by Thread:	Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, Shmulik Hen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]