Re: [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement.

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <E19mFqr-00068T-00@tetrachloride> (at Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:48:57 
+0100), davej@xxxxxxxxxx says:

> Is this intentional? It should at least have a 
> /* FALLTHROUGH */ or similar if so.

Of course not.

>               else
>                       val = opt->offset;
> +             break;
>  
>       default:
>               return -ENOPROTOOPT;

agreed.

--yoshfuji