| To: | shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master's settings to slaves |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 08 Aug 2003 18:01:16 -0400 |
| Cc: | bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200308081744.58946.shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <200308081744.58946.shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Shmulik, Some of this bonding stuff is pretty scary. Lotsa policies in the kernel and communication seems to be centred around /proc. Shouldnt policies on failover be really driven from user space? Also shouldnt communication be using something like netlink? cheers, jamal On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 10:44, Shmulik Hen wrote: > 2 - Change monitoring function use the new functionality. > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | A question on inet_select_addr(), ahtraps |
| Previous by Thread: | [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master's settings to slaves, Shmulik Hen |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master's settings to slaves, Hen, Shmulik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |