netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Make XFRM optional

To: ak@xxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make XFRM optional
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 21:58:01 +0900 (JST)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030804125022.GA8167@averell>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20030804125022.GA8167@averell>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hello.

In article <20030804125022.GA8167@averell> (at Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:50:22 +0200), 
Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> says:

> diff -u linux-work/net/ipv6/Kconfig-XFRM linux-work/net/ipv6/Kconfig
> --- linux-work/net/ipv6/Kconfig-XFRM  2003-07-18 02:39:29.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-work/net/ipv6/Kconfig       2003-08-03 23:12:25.000000000 +0200
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>  config IPV6_PRIVACY
>       bool "IPv6: Privacy Extensions (RFC 3041) support"
>       depends on IPV6
> +     select XFRM
>       select CRYPTO
>       select CRYPTO_MD5
>       ---help---

We do not need this.

> @@ -57,6 +61,7 @@
>  
>  config IPV6_TUNNEL
>       tristate "IPv6: IPv6-in-IPv6 tunnel"
> +     select XFRM
>       depends on IPV6
>       ---help---
>         Support for IPv6-in-IPv6 tunnels described in RFC 2473.

We do not need this for now.

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>