| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] ethtool_ops rev 4 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:34:15 -0700 |
| Cc: | willy@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3F2AF938.7050608@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030801150232.GV22222@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030801154021.GA7696@xxxxxxx> <20030801154656.GW22222@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030801162536.GA18574@xxxxxxx> <20030801132037.3f3542ae.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3F2AE91D.5090705@xxxxxxxxx> <3F2AEB33.9050506@xxxxxxxxx> <20030801153439.4a324c36.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3F2AF32F.7090201@xxxxxxxxx> <20030801160857.32ebbf22.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3F2AF938.7050608@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:35:20 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Inside an area allocated by the kcompat lib. SET_ETHTOOL_OPS takes > 'struct net_device *' and 'struct ethtool_ops *' arguments, so it simply > needs to create a lookup list/table somewhere. Ok ok ok, we're converging :-) Please just comment on my other email suggesting a way to do away with DO_ETHTOOL_OPS. I'm OK with a SET_ETHTOOL_OPS() macro. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ethtool_ops rev 4, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ethtool_ops rev 4, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] ethtool_ops rev 4, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] ethtool_ops rev 4, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |