| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices |
| From: | "Carlos Velasco" <carlosev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Jul 2003 03:23:02 +0200 |
| Cc: | bloemsaa@xxxxxxxxx, marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, layes@xxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030727175557.1d624b36.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.53.0307272239570.2743@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200307280140470646.1078EC67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030727164649.517b2b88.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307280158250677.10891156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030727165831.05904792.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307280211590888.10957DD9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030727171403.6e5bcc58.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307280235210263.10AADFF8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030727173600.475d95fb.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307280253090799.10BB2DF0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030727175557.1d624b36.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 27/07/2003 at 17:55 David S. Miller wrote: >With or without your suggestion, people have to do something >different. Just enabling the hidden switch solved my setting and I think it solves most of "problem" settings. >This doesn't even address all the problems there are with >the hidden patch. It does things that belong on the netfilter >level and not on the ARP/routing level. Well... it's just your opinion... other OS and systems don't use netfilter of firewalling at all (ex. Win) and behave like with "hidden" applied. Really, the only one I have tested that not do it is Linux 2.2+ For me (not a kernel developer), my world are the OSI layers, and the isolation of the interfaces at layer 2 IMHO should be in the kernel not any firewall module that you must install, tune and configure. >Again, I'd like you to read all the discussions that have happened on >this topic in the past, in particular those made by Alexey Kuznetsov >on this topic. He gives very clear and concise reasons why the >"hidden" patch is logically doing things in the wrong part of the >kernel, and therefore won't ever be put into the tree. I will look... but doing arp filter is not a real simple solution in any way. Regards, Carlos Velasco |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |