| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Julian Anastasov" <ja@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bug? ARP with wrong src IP address |
| From: | "Carlos Velasco" <carlosev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:24:19 +0200 |
| Cc: | bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030724091007.68923845.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200307241728270476.0031BAB0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307241849341.2177-100000@l> <20030724091007.68923845.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 24/07/2003 at 9:10 David S. Miller wrote: >The hidden patch is not necessary with current kernels and arpfilter. arp_filter doesn't work. If I'm not wrong it's applied when you have two or more interfaces in the same subnet. This is not the case. I have applied hidden patch and it works. If I'm not wrong, the hidden patch makes linux behave like other OS, separating selected interfaces of another interfaces. It does not break anything because it's all configurable in /proc. Maybe it would be good including it in the kernel package? Regards, Carlos Velasco |
| Previous by Date: | Local dos in linux socket filters, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bug? ARP with wrong src IP address, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bug? ARP with wrong src IP address, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bug? ARP with wrong src IP address, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |