Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1

To:	Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:22:41 -0700
Cc:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<3F20766C.3060400@xxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<200307241443.SAA09525@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3F20766C.3060400@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 17:14:36 -0700
Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So people are ok with using struct ? Since it can be typecast as an array :-)

I think something more like route metrics, ie. an array,
is more appropriate and that Alexey is right about this.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, (continued) O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, David S. Miller Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, David S. Miller Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, kuznet Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, kuznet Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, David S. Miller <= Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, David S. Miller Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar [PATCH] Prefix List against 2.4.21, Krishna Kumar Re: [PATCH] Prefix List against 2.4.21, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明

Previous by Date:	Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar
Next by Date:	Local dos in linux socket filters, Patrick McHardy
Previous by Thread:	Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar
Next by Thread:	Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]