| To: | Glenn Fowler <gsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair() |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 23 Jul 2003 20:08:21 +0100 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, dgk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200307231854.OAA90112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <200307231428.KAA15254@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030723074615.25eea776.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307231656.MAA69129@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030723100043.18d5b025.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307231724.NAA90957@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030723103135.3eac4cd2.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307231814.OAA74344@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030723112307.5b8ae55c.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307231854.OAA90112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mer, 2003-07-23 at 19:54, Glenn Fowler wrote: > named unix sockets reside in the fs namespace, no? > so they must be linked to a dir before use and unlinked after use > the unlink after use would be particularly tricky for the parent process > implementing > cmd <(cmd ...) ... Portable stuff yes, Linux also supports a pure socket namespace for them when the path starts with a nul character |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [bernie@xxxxxxxxxxx: Kernel 2.6 size increase], Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair(), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair(), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair(), Alan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |