| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netdev_ops? |
| From: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:30:10 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030722220745.379a73c6.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Candela Technologies |
| References: | <3F1E17BC.30100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030722220745.379a73c6.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529 |
David S. Miller wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:06:04 -0700 Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Any progress towards getting the netdev_ops into 2.4? I have several patches that would benefit (in that no new ioctls would be needed) if this goes in.If anything, it's going to go into 2.6.x first, and then backported to 2.4.x after it's had a few months of testing and tweaking. Any interest in a lower-risk netdev-ops lite? I have a relatively ugly little patch that will allow me to handle certain ETHTOOL ioctls in dev.c's ioctl handling code. Ugly, but short, and very little chance of breaking anything else.... -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netdev_ops?, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: netdev_ops?, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netdev_ops?, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netdev_ops?, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |