| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: [PATCH][2.6] propogate rx errors from raw_rcv_skb |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2003 05:25:52 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zwane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030716195345.21b9b9fc.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030716195345.21b9b9fc.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:53:45 -0700 "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This looks somewhat sane, ipv6 doesn't seem to need it as it > always returns 0 Nothing that calls raw_rcv() checks the return value, so what's the point? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH][2.4] more atm backports for 2.4, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Fw: [PATCH][2.6] propogate rx errors from raw_rcv_skb, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anycast usage, final diagnosis? (was: IPv6: Fix broken anycast, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |