-----Forwarded Message-----
> From: Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: kernel 2.4.21
> Date: 19 Jul 2003 16:38:11 +0200
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a little question...
>
>
> Summary of changes from v2.4.21-pre4 to v2.4.21-pre5
> ============================================
>
> Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> o ACPI apparently wasnt bios
> o fix wrong date in microcode comment
> o add another legitimate P4 type
> o must disallow write combine on 450NX
> o add framework for ndelay (nanoseconds)
> o first block of parisc resend
> o second block of parisc merge
> o third block of parisc merge
> o Ian Nelson moved
> o update videobook docs to avoid check_region
> o docs for IPMI
> o remove dead init call
> o add AMD hammer rng
> o IPMI driver updates
> o keyboard changes
> o fix wrong test in raw driver
> o fix paths for ide
> o clarify hpt37x config
> o fix more ide paths
> o Paul's fix to do ide_cs handling in task context
> o more ide paths
> o fix use of check_region in umc driver
> o more ide comment/doc info updates
> o promise printk cleanups
> o another wrong path
> o IDE printk/cleanup bits
> o fix padding on eepro driver
>
> In this patch, is it possible that there is a problem in the fix of
> eepro driver? Since I upgrade the kernel with 2.4.20-8 (kernel-source
> tag in debian) which include this patch I have some problem with packets
> which are sometimes truncated... (the server runs an ircd and the result
> is a delink).
>
> Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
> Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
> ((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
> t af_inet.c(689)
> Jul 17 18:27:53 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
> Jul 17 18:27:53 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
> ((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
> t af_inet.c(689)
> Jul 17 20:52:35 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
> Jul 17 20:52:35 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
> ((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
> t af_inet.c(689)
> Jul 17 21:52:16 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
> Jul 17 21:52:16 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
> ((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
> t af_inet.c(689)
> Jul 17 22:49:31 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
> Jul 17 22:49:31 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
> ((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
> t af_inet.c(689)
>
> OR
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
>
>
> If I do a rollback, no more problems... I don't test yet a 2.4.21 kernel.
>
> Hardware is a Dell PowerAppWeb 120A with one CPU P3 1 GHz / 256 Mo RAM /
>
> Now Kernel is generated under debian with kernel-source-2.4.20-2 and gcc
> version 2.95.4 20011002.
>
> Any idea? (Thanks for your help)
>
> --
> Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|