| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Anycast usage, final diagnosis? (was: IPv6: Fix broken anycast |
| From: | Mika Liljeberg <mika.liljeberg@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 17 Jul 2003 12:32:33 +0300 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200307170906.NAA13688@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200307170906.NAA13688@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 12:06, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> They cannot intersect, otherwise RTF_LOCAL thing will not work.
>
> I deliberately blocked attempt to add a local address as anycast
> in anycast.c, see another chunk.
Ok, I missed that one.
I guess it's safe to assume that the anycast and unicast spaces will not
intersect, even though the addresses are allocated from the same range.
I was wondering how to dynamically assign anycast addresses. In theory
one could abuse the unicast address assignment mechanisms (in the
absence of anything else users might be tempted to try this). But that's
a different issue.
MikaL
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow 6to4 routes with SIT, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anycast usage, final diagnosis? (was: IPv6: Fix broken anycast, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Anycast usage, final diagnosis? (was: IPv6: Fix broken anycast, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Fw: [PATCH][2.6] propogate rx errors from raw_rcv_skb, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |