netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73

To: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 15:59:30 +0900 (JST)
Cc: krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200307150117.FAA06705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307141300520.5140-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200307150117.FAA06705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <200307150117.FAA06705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 15 Jul 2003 05:17:53 
+0400 (MSD)), kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says:

> Hello!
> 
> > inet6_fill_ifaddr (and introduce RTM_IFACEFLAGS). This will be specific to
> > IPv6. Are you agreeable to this ?
> ...
> > +   IFA_IFFLAGS,
> 
> What's about ifa_flags? There is some space there, and the things
> kept there now: TENTATIVE/DEPRECATED et al. are close relatives
> of O/M.

Alexey, O/M are not flags for addresses, but for interfaces.
I believe we should not mix them up.

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>