[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops

To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 02:53:54 -0300
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20030711200423.GL20424@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Conectiva S.A.
References: <20030708163042.GL23597@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3F0B2D30.4020102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030708212551.GL1939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030708.150835.78728697.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030709161520.GW1939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030711193215.GH16037@xxxxxxx> <20030711200423.GL20424@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Em Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:04:23PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox escreveu:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:32:15PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > 1) The _ops are either too limited in scope, or too wide in scope.
> Couldn't agree more.  I blame acme -- he wants me to push it to be much
> wider in scope.  Let's push _all_ the function pointers into netdev_ops.

Hey, it was just a brainstorm session ;) Anyway, I'm heavily backlogged as
I'm on a business trip for several days already, I'll try to read all this
thread when I'm back home 8)

- Arnaldo

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>