Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked

[Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Who adds the subnet router anycast address, kernel itself? Since what? I 
don't see this in 2.5.
--Mika


YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? wrote:

> In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307111143470.26262-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 
> 11:46:00 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
>
>  
>
> > > I don't like this
> > > while I would be ok to have configuration option
> > > not to support anycast.
> > >      
> > With "not to support anycast" you probably meant "not to support
> > subnet-router anycast address [automatically, in the kernel, as now]" ?  
> > These are entirely different things.
> >    
> I meant disabling anycast entirely.
>
>  
>
> > (Note that if there's a user-level API for setting anycast addresses, one 
> > could kick the subnet-router anycast address out of the kernel too.  
> > Whether that's desirable is another thing.)
> >    
> We have but we cannot; it is refcnt'ed.
>
> --yoshfuji
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>