| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:41:36 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, tgraf@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030710.172923.27804984.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20030710233223.GA30577@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030711.093546.12708723.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030710.172923.27804984.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20030710.172923.27804984.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:29:23 -0700 (PDT)), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:35:46 +0900 (JST) > > I aggeed on this, however we may want to do for whole tree at same time. > How do you think, folks? > > Sure, just send more patches relative to this one :-) Okay, I'll do this as much as I can do... --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, Andre Tomt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |